
[ad_1]
Jake Paul has brought about recent controversy among the many boxing group together with his newest tweet about Canelo Alvarez.
The three-Zero YouTuber-turned-boxer is about for his fourth professional battle in opposition to Tyron Woodley on August 29.
Esther Lin/SHOWTIME
Nonetheless, he claims to have far greater ambitions for the not-too-distant-future.
Jake has mentioned he believes he’ll have the ability to face the game’s present pound-for-pound king Canelo inside the subsequent three years.
And his newest tweet evaluating himself to the Mexican hasn’t gone down too effectively with followers.
Jake posted: “Canelo Alvarez’s opponent in his 10th battle was 0-0, and whom after defeat, by no means fought once more.
“In my 4th battle I’m taking over a pound-for-pound embellished fighter who has received on the most important phases and is taken into account one of many high welterweights ever.”
Ed Mulholland/Matchroom
Jake after all failed to say the minor element that his opponent can also be 0-Zero in boxing, and is simply a high welterweight in MMA.
He additionally uncared for to carry up the truth that Canelo turned skilled at age 15 and so was a baby for almost all of his early studying fights.
These deliberate exclusions prompted a collection of indignant replies.
One mentioned: “Canelo was additionally 16….”
And one other added: “Canelo fought individuals who educated for boxing. You don’t.”
Whereas a 3rd put: “Yeah, however you’ll by no means be on Canelo’s stage so what’s your level?”
In his earlier feedback about Canelo, Jake instructed reporters: “If Billy Joe Saunders, who fights like a wild rooster, can get a payday vs Canelo and final that many rounds.
“Or Avni Yildirim, the ‘Turkish Warrior’ can go in there and final three rounds. Yildirim didn’t throw a single f***ing punch.
“I’m a a lot better fighter than each of these boxers.
“I’m greater, quicker, stronger, extra athletic.
“So if these guys can go in there and hold in there with Canelo, can Jake Paul in three years go 12 rounds and beat him? We’ll see.
“Don’t put it previous [me].”
[ad_2]
Supply hyperlink